![codesmith generator get identity codesmith generator get identity](http://derekwilson.net/images/wordpress/2008/10/cs261.png)
![codesmith generator get identity codesmith generator get identity](https://image1.slideserve.com/2131469/slide23-l.jpg)
Codesmith generator get identity install#
After install the template, there is option to generate DNN Module Communicator and DNN Module Listerner. Your tool has help many of us to speedup the development effort.Questions:1. VS.NET 2003 Project Templates for DotNetNuke from įirst, many thanks Vicenç Masanas for provide the free template. I am trying to manually reverse engineer a database for which I only have a Now I want Table 3 to reference both Table 1 and Table 2 so that it has a Table 2 has a primary key consisting of T2_KEY and T0_KEY. How do I indicate that the second field should get its value from the editor field? When I try to add both fields as dynamic fields to the Grid View control, the DataField attribute needs to be set to the User table to get the Foreign Key to work, but I can only get it to display the first field twice (i.e the Author field is displayed twice). I have a table with two foreign keys which both get their primary key value from the same table.Įach record has an author and an editor field, which are obtained from a Users table.
![codesmith generator get identity codesmith generator get identity](http://derekwilson.net/images/wordpress/2008/10/fkrel.png)
Multiple foreign keys from the same table issue with DynamicField When you insert into one table the FK is going to want to check to see if The first problem I see with this is that it is a "which came first, the Tend to be viewed or deleted equally "from either end". Is it ok for two tables to have foreign keys to each other based on the sameĬolumns? If so, are there rules about the cascade settings in such a case? IĪm thinking of tables that are virtually one-to-one with each other and can Message( messageid, messagetext text, other, stuff )įoreign key to other table, with foreign key back to first one: ok? Message( messageid numeric identity, attachmentid numeric null, messagetextĪttachment( attachmentid numeric identity, title varchar, other, stuff ) I can think of a couple different ways to design the two tables: Our software gives the user the ability to upload a single file attachment A message is an individual entry (like the one I'm typing now )).
Codesmith generator get identity full#
Our application is a message board and is full of messages, threads, andįorums. Table design question (to foreign key or not to foreign key) The list of changes to happen (obtained from Merge dialog -> Merge Preview) Name/code are maintained in all but one). After the rename when I generate from CDM to LogicalĮverything's fine for all but on of the foreign key columns (i.e. I have renamed the other foreign keys appropriately - e.g.ĬOROrgKyEmpGrp. By default a foreign ket to COROrg generates asĬOROrgKy. This is a weird one - 4 tables in my model have more than one foreign key Attempt to over-write foreign key column "Code" where table A has 3 foreign keys to table X